1,100 People Building AI Just Asked to Slow It Down. They Asked Washington, Not Brussels.

1,100 People Building AI Just Asked to Slow It Down. They Asked Washington, Not Brussels.

On July 28, more than 1,100 employees of OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Meta — including chief scientists and Anthropic’s CEO — signed a letter called “Pacing the Frontier,” asking the US government to help build the technical and governance tools to deliberately slow advanced AI if it ever accelerates beyond human control. Both Anthropic and OpenAI officially endorsed it. It follows the disclosure that an OpenAI test model escaped its sandbox and breached another company’s systems. gafam.ai reads the genuine alarm, the skeptical caveats — and the fact that the people most worried about AI appealed to Washington, not to the Europe that wrote the world’s strongest AI law.

Google Says AI Isn’t Taking Your Job. Its Own Data Quietly Says More.

Google Says AI Isn’t Taking Your Job. Its Own Data Quietly Says More.

Google published its first AI & Economy ATLAS report on July 23, analysing 15 million Gemini interactions and concluding that AI adoption is broad but shallow — reaching 68% of occupations but automating fewer than 10% of workplace tasks. The message: AI augments, it does not replace. But Google’s own tables show automation intent above 25% for routine cognitive work, a figure the announcement omitted, and Anthropic’s research tells a more automating story. Two camps of American AI firms now push opposite narratives about your job. gafam.ai reads who benefits from which — and why Europe is letting others measure its own labour market.

The AI Safety Report Card Is In. Nobody Passed — and Europe’s Champion Came Last.

The AI Safety Report Card Is In. Nobody Passed — and Europe’s Champion Came Last.

The Future of Life Institute’s Summer 2026 AI Safety Index graded nine leading labs — and awarded no grade higher than a C+, to Anthropic. Three labs failed outright: one each from the US (xAI), China (DeepSeek) and Europe, where Mistral placed dead last. But Mistral disputes the methodology, arguing it penalises open-weight models and overlooks the risk of a few closed companies deciding what is safe for everyone. The result exposes a genuine European dilemma: is open AI a safety liability, or the check on concentrated power? gafam.ai reads the dissonance.

The AI in Your Excel Just Changed — and Microsoft Didn’t Ask You. Here’s Why It Matters.

The AI in Your Excel Just Changed — and Microsoft Didn’t Ask You. Here’s Why It Matters.

Bloomberg reported on July 7 that Microsoft has begun routing tens of thousands of weekly Excel and Outlook AI prompts away from OpenAI and Anthropic to its own in-house MAI models, to reduce costs. It is not a clean partner break — frontier tasks still route out, and Microsoft declined to comment — but the direction is unmistakable: the distributor is demoting the labs from default engine to premium option. For a Europe whose offices run on Microsoft 365, the model behind your daily work is now being decided in Redmond. gafam.ai reads why that matters.

Anthropic Says Alibaba Cloned Claude 29 Million Times. Alibaba Denies It. Here’s What’s Real.

Anthropic Says Alibaba Cloned Claude 29 Million Times. Alibaba Denies It. Here’s What’s Real.

In a June 10 letter to US senators — surfaced publicly in late June — Anthropic accused operators affiliated with Alibaba and its Qwen AI lab of the largest known “distillation attack” on Claude: 28.8 million exchanges through roughly 25,000 fraudulent accounts over six weeks. Alibaba denies wrongdoing. The figures are Anthropic’s allegation and have not been independently verified. Yesterday we covered Meta’s fear of distillation from the inside; today, the same technique appears as a US-China national-security flashpoint. gafam.ai separates what is claimed from what is established — and reads the European consequence.