OpenAI says 10,000 AI agents produced a proof for the Navier-Stokes Millennium Problem in 88 hours. The capability is staggering — but it’s a proposed proof, the Clay Institute still lists the problem as unsolved, OpenAI isn’t claiming the prize, and its independence is already disputed. Be amazed, and wait for the mathematicians. And what it means when science becomes a function of compute.
The first monthly update to the GAFAM Reality Index: overall down one point to 51%. The whole decline lands in a single dimension — Respect for Users — as Google’s screen-parsing assistant and Meta’s $17 billion child-addiction settlement drag two giants down. Europe and the Future held steady.
Nvidia just answered the question hanging over AI: the boom isn’t slowing, it’s accelerating, with five US giants set to spend $1.3 trillion next year. Boom or bubble, the scale is staggering — and Europe, able to regulate AI but not to build it, is barely at the table.
The debate about AI is stuck on pictures — too perfect, too soulless. It’s a comfortable decoy. The real danger isn’t a machine that wakes up and hates us. It’s that we hand over our judgement, our choices, our relevance, one reasonable step at a time — and never notice the moment it stopped needing us.
Meta is on trial in California over features allegedly designed to addict children, with its own leaked memos as evidence. Seen from Europe, it’s a slow, painful demonstration of why the Digital Services Act regulates this design up front — while America litigates it one case at a time.